Whenever I talk to someone about the relationship between
MIDI and
digital audio, one of my favorite analogies is that of computer images.
A digital
raster image like a JPG file contains a bitmap. It is equivalent to an MP3 file containing digital audio. Both JPG and MP3 files contain quality loss compressed data, although other formats such as BMP and WAV files can contain pictures and digital sound without compression, respectively. In both cases the files store a set of digitized values. In the case of images, the data are individual pixels or dots that represent colors of the cells in a matrix of rows and columns that divide the digitized image. In the case of sound, individual data are samples that represent moments of time which divides the digitized sound. The digitization consists in dividing alike the image or sound into small fragments, the number of which depends on the resolution we want to get and the size of the scanned original.
Another type of images is called
vector graphics. They are not suitable to represent photographs, but drawings. SVG files that are used in many illustrations of
Wikipedia are of this type. Instead of image fragments, they contain symbolic descriptions using coordinates of points, distances, lines, and colors... They have the advantage of scalability without loss of quality, and ease of arbitrary modification of some of its components and properties without affecting the rest. The equivalent of this technology in the world of sound is MIDI. A MIDI sequence contains timestamped messages such as notes, instrument changes, controls, etc.. Not a proper format for storing sounds recorded by a microphone, but a symbolic representation of music similar to a score.
Images are two dimensional objects, so the digitized images consist of rows and columns of elements (pixels), and the position of the elements of a drawing is characterized by a pair of numbers that represent its Cartesian coordinates. On the other hand sound recordings are one-dimensional, sound samples are taken at constant time intervals and also MIDI messages are labeled by their position in the time line.
The above similarities have implications that reflect additional parallelism. An uncompressed digitized image consisting of any single solid color takes the same amount of memory than an image of the same size representing a photograph or a complex composition of multiple colors. Similarly, a recording of silence (for example
John Cage's 4'33'') takes the same amount of memory than any symphonic piece of the same duration. On the other hand, a simple vector image takes much less memory than a complex picture of the same dimensions. And a few notes MIDI sequence occupies much less memory than a complex sequence of the same duration made up of many notes or other messages.
The problems posed by digital images and sounds on stretch and reduction of dimensions are also similar. In both cases artifacts are generated, an effect known as '
aliasing', which can be offset to some extent by using 'antialiasing' filters. On the other hand, in the case of vector graphics as MIDI sequences, you can easily perform stretching and shrinking of dimensions and duration without risking artifacts or quality loss whatsoever.
Starting from a vector image, it is necessary a rendering engine to get a digital image that can be displayed on the screen or a printer. In the case of MIDI, a sequencer and a MIDI synthesizer are required to produce digital audio that can be used by an audio interface.
The programs
Inkscape and
Gimp, used in Linux for creating and editing vector graphics and digital images respectively, are comparable to the Adobe programs Illustrator and Photoshop. They cover different needs and audience, thriving on different niches. An example of this type of niche is the architects, who use vector graphics to design and represent buildings with Autocad or similar programs. These are not watertight compartments. Gimp can import vector graphic files, rendering them as bitmaps. Inkscape can also import a bitmap image as a drawing object. In each case, the users may choose the best tool for each task.
While it has been easy to list some essential image processing programs for Linux and other systems, to do the same exercise in the field of audio and MIDI is much more risky. The problem is that the way musicians work with computers is not homogeneous, with each musician working in a different way. For old school types the ideal work-flow is to note down musical ideas, develop drafts and refine compositions using tools that work with symbolic elements, producing as a final result a paper copy of the score.
Rosegarden could be appropriate at this stage. On the other extreme, there are those who never in his life read or write a score, and whose only tools of creation (other than musical instruments) are the mixer and multi-track recorder. In this case,
Ardour could be right.
The two applications mentioned above allow the use of digital audio and MIDI at the same time. In the same way as in the world of images, some applications are focused on the symbolic representation (MIDI) and others in a final product (digital audio). In each case, the use of the other technology will be subordinate. For instance, Ardour MIDI messages are aligned to the audio samples. It has even developed an API (Jack MIDI) to ensure synchronization of MIDI events to digital audio samples, subordinating MIDI to the rules of digital audio. Obviously this strategy does not fit adequately on all scenarios where MIDI is useful.
As in the imaging world, symbolic representation (MIDI) is probably better suited for design, drafting and composition. By contrast, digital audio is the dominant technology in the studio, at mixing stage and production, to obtain a finished product.
